President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of Tulsi Gabbard as U.S. intelligence chief has stunned the national security community. Concerns are growing that the vast intelligence sector might become even more politicized. #TulsiGabbardIntelligenceChief
Trump’s decision to nominate Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman lacking significant intelligence experience, is controversial. Critics note her perceived leniency toward Russia and Syria. Her nomination aligns with other key appointments, raising fears that Trump values loyalty over competence in forming his second-term administration.
Current and former intelligence officials, along with independent experts, express serious concerns. They worry advisers may distort global threat assessments to satisfy Trump. Additionally, foreign partners might hesitate to share crucial intelligence.
Randal Phillips, a former CIA operations directorate official and top agency representative in China, shared his concerns. He stated that having Trump loyalists in high government positions “could become the avenue of choice for some really questionable actions” by intelligence community leaders.
A Western security source mentioned that intelligence sharing might slow when Trump takes office in January. This slowdown could affect the “Five Eyes” alliance, which includes the U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
U.S. allies worry that Trump’s appointments lean in the “wrong direction,” the source mentioned.
Trump’s transition team did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Both inside and outside the U.S. intelligence community, much of the concern centers on Trump’s pick of Gabbard, 43, as director of national intelligence. Critics point to her views, seen as sympathetic to Russia in its war against Ukraine.
Although Trump made conventional choices, such as nominating Senator Marco Rubio for secretary of state, Wednesday’s announcement of Gabbard surprised even some Republicans. As an officer in the U.S. Army Reserves, she will likely face rigorous questioning during Senate confirmation. #TulsiGabbardIntelligenceChief
Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022, has faced controversy. Her criticism of President Biden’s support for Ukraine led some to accuse her of echoing Kremlin propaganda.
Critics and Supporters Weigh in on Tulsi Gabbard’s Intelligence Chief Appointment
Finally, while Tulsi Gabbard intelligence chief generates controversy, Trump’s loyalty-based appointments draw skepticism. Critics question Gabbard’s limited intelligence experience compared to traditional appointees. However, her supporters argue that her diverse background brings a fresh perspective. Still, many await Senate hearings to assess her plans and capabilities.
